How is pseudoscience typically viewed in the scientific community?

Pseudoscience is viewed in the scientific community as lacking credible scientific support because it does not adhere to the rigorous standards of scientific methodology. Research and claims associated with pseudoscience often rely on anecdotal evidence, fail to make testable predictions, or do not undergo peer review. This lack of rigorous testing and validation means that claims made by pseudoscientific approaches are generally not supported by substantial evidence or reproducible results, which are critical components of valid scientific inquiry.

In contrast, scientific inquiry relies on a systematic approach that includes hypothesis formulation, empirical testing, and the use of controlled conditions to draw reliable conclusions. Pseudoscience often dismisses or overlooks these fundamental practices, leading to the scientific community's general skepticism regarding its legitimacy and applicability. Thus, the identification of pseudoscience is important for maintaining the integrity of scientific discourse and protecting individuals from ineffective or misleading practices.